Skip to main content

Design Deep Dive: Amberlodge

Well would you look at that, it’s next week! Feels like it was just last week.  Because it was.  Time is a river that has flooded its banks, and we will all drown in its bitter, brackish tide.  Uh I mean leeeeeeet’s talk about Amberlodge hahahaha.

A recent thought that entered my head was that the lodge has been mothballed, so there’s some basic starting trees, storage, and equipment, and several facedown rooms and groves that can reveal new tapped trees when explored or storage rooms or machinery when excavated.  Are there a limited number of rooms? Is it a fixed or variable setup of face-down cards? Decks? I feel this overpowering urge to take the cards I have made, matching/version/compatibility be damned, get a pen, pencil, and several blanks, and just start playing the game into existence, scribbling on cards as they would come into play.  Do I want achievements? Could they grant a separate special ubiquitous currency that can be spent universally across all the different systems? Could a forest deck include not just maples and walnuts but berry thickets and beehives? Could discovery achievements trigger new recipes?

Maybe I just do need to try mocking out a game, to really identify the pieces that still need to be designed, but also to leave room for inspiration to jump in.  It might be more enjoyable than following my meticulously plotted out to-do list, and if not, well, the list isn’t going anywhere, and I can start at the top knowing I gave spontaneity a try.  I’m gonna commit to trying it this week or weekend: I just gotta clear a surface, put up a post-it note reminding myself not to slow down, and go for it.

Now, even if that works, there’s still a long way to go.  This game is at least a minor order of complexity more involved than Fantasy GM Squared, or Birch Crown.  Both of those are complete if not final prototypes, but they also model fewer systems.  Perhaps once I do start going through my punchlist for the different systems, it would behoove me not to do all the producers and then all the processors and then all the recipes, but rather to focus on the bare minimum to illustrate basic proof of concept, what the flow of play would be, what setup would look like, and what the mathematical foundation for the game’s economies and currencies are.

Looking at it that way, it’s even more appealing to try to play a game where I build it as I go.  In order to build some momentum, I need to establish a core gameplay loop.  All the variety, all the tension, can be layered on, and therefore more easily stripped away if not workable.  Like expansions.  Yes.

Okay, so.  I think I’ve got my plan for this week and next.  Find the core game.  Build the core game.  Expand the core game, one category at a time.  Neat! Now I just have to… execute... 

I’ll let you know how that goes.  Til next time!



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

TTRPG Tuesday: Three Means Of Resolving

Hi it’s another TTRPG Tuesday! First of the year.  Let’s get right into it. Saw a challenge on Twitter to make some resolution mechanics.  I can do those! Here we go: Hand to Hand The player performing the action and the person running the game or otherwise opposing the action both put their dominant fists toward one another, bounce them three times to get a rhythm, and reveal a number with their fingers, 0-5.  Sum the two numbers, and if the number is greater than 5, subtract six, so that the final number is always between 0 and 5.  On a 0, the action fails catastrophically, on a 1-2 it fails, 3-4 it succeeds, on a 5 it succeeds spectacularly.  The player taking the action starts the game with all five fingers up on their non-dominant hand; after an attempt, they may lower fingers on that hand to add to the sum of the attempt. Ex. Alice attempts to seduce Cat’s character over to the coup conspirators.  They put their dominant hands together (right for Alice, left for Cat) and thro
Post a Comment
Read more

TTRPG Tuesday: Beliefs as Roles

  Hello from high above the Rockies, as I make my way back to Chicago from Big Bad Con 2023.     This was my first con in five years, and only my second ever.     I had a better time at it than I did at GenCon, which I understand derives largely from this being an industry con vs a consumer show.     I made a modest number of purchases but it was easy to stick to the constraints of my limited luggage space, which was fine; shopping and new releases were not the attraction here.     Gaming, panels, and (as I soon learned) networking were. This con was certainly less overwhelming and I think my expectations were clearer and my FOMO much lighter, but I’ll readily admit that I had a lot to learn.    I misunderstood or made mistakes regarding almost every event I signed up for, including happy accidents like sitting in on the wrong panel only to learn a ton, or expecting a mending workshop to be about fixing one’s writing when the application was rather more literal, which was a fascinat
Post a Comment
Read more

TTRPG Tuesday: Minimum Viable Product for WWDW?

Hello and welcome back to TTRPG Tuesday! I’ve put together a barebones introductory document for We Won, Didn’t We? and, well, I think it speaks for itself.  Check it out HERE ! This introduces the skeleton of the game, as well as walking through the steps; I’d say next up is a rudimentary character sheet, and maybe I can bring this to a Playtest Zero session and see what folks think of character creation within one of the starting Bulbs.  I’ve opened the doc up for comments, so if you have thoughts dear reader, fire away.  Brain fried, go read the doc, til next time!
Post a Comment
Read more