Skip to main content

Mechanic Monday: Threat Population and Movement in BURN

Must type quickly, as I’ve been working on grants stuff and have run out of daytime.  So the non sequiturs are going to hit hard, and they are going to hit fast.  One thing that’s been rattling around this spent candy shell of a skull that I have, is the half-finished thought “Every lesson is incomplete until you teach it”.  Gonna keep tinkering with that particular cookie fortune but I really cannot deny that teaching my playwriting class has been so tremendously helpful in terms of getting my thoughts in order.  Not that they are, in fact, the best thoughts, nor is the order entirely quite right! I’ve been listening to podcasts at 1.5x speed, and when I get nervous, I certainly teach at that speed as well.  But it’s true: the more I have to articulate, instruct, and tailor the lesson to the student, the more questions I have to answer, the more challenges to my understanding, the better grasp I feel on the subject.  I’m dissecting my own assumptions better and thinking more critically about things, and on more levels.  Am I braggin? Maybe a little! I don’t know why I do these intro paragraphs, literally no one wants them, the Internet hates when recipes do them and if I ever try and publish the useful bits of this blog in any way they’ll all have to go.  And yet!

Threat Population and Movement in BURN
In BURN both players draw from a shared deck of cards, each of which shows threats or resources that can be found in a location.  The cards are also one of three suits; Fox, Rabbit, or Mouse.  Each turn, the players examine their hand to evaluate which direction is safest for the Agent to move; the Handler can take actions to send a message to the Agent (recommending a specific direction) or remove cards from their hand (mitigating threats) but ultimately the decision must be made by the Agent.  Once the Agent has settled on a direction, both players reveal the cards of that direction/suit - these are the threats and resources that populate the space the Agent has moved to.  The Agent then takes actions to contend with the options and hazards in that space.

So this is my solution to the old Battleship style approach to threats that each player could see but the other could not.  In classic Fin fashion, I’ve taken board information and put it on cards.  I’m incorrigible.  What this also achieves is that it creates a decision that acts as a hinge between two active phases; both players are taking in information during the first phase, but the only actions taken are by the Handler, culminating in a decision made by the Agent, after which the Agent must take actions that, naturally, have consequences the Handler must track and make plans for in the next turn.
Alright it’s 6 o’clock here and I need a bath and time out of this study.  Take it easy, [no audience found], catch you next time.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

TTRPG Tuesday: Three Means Of Resolving

Hi it’s another TTRPG Tuesday! First of the year.  Let’s get right into it. Saw a challenge on Twitter to make some resolution mechanics.  I can do those! Here we go: Hand to Hand The player performing the action and the person running the game or otherwise opposing the action both put their dominant fists toward one another, bounce them three times to get a rhythm, and reveal a number with their fingers, 0-5.  Sum the two numbers, and if the number is greater than 5, subtract six, so that the final number is always between 0 and 5.  On a 0, the action fails catastrophically, on a 1-2 it fails, 3-4 it succeeds, on a 5 it succeeds spectacularly.  The player taking the action starts the game with all five fingers up on their non-dominant hand; after an attempt, they may lower fingers on that hand to add to the sum of the attempt. Ex. Alice attempts to seduce Cat’s character over to the coup conspirators.  They put their dominant hands together (right for ...
Post a Comment
Read more

TTRPG Tuesday: Campaigning

  Hey it's TTRPG Tuesday, let's see if I get something written before sleep overtakes me. I'm still on that Channelers kick, but today I want to talk about a possible campaign path: The Magpie Offensive.  I see this as a military campaign where the PCs are conscripted, volunteers, or mercenaries for an army that is marching to quell Spirit threats and unite the region under a protectorate. There should be free RP sections as interludes between missions, and missions should be chosen by the party.  The army ensures loyalty with intangible rewards as well as artifact items. NOTE: This whole thing is being designed with the Rascal article on militarization in ttrpgs in mind. What is the thrust of the campaign? It's fundamentally one of conquest.  How do I encourage characters to question their presence and their complicity? How much interpersonal violence is an acceptable price to pay for environmental justice? How can party composition affect all this from jump? H...
Post a Comment
Read more

TTRPG Tuesday: Channeling Curses

  Hey it's TTRPG Tuesday.  Well I’m gonna start writing one on a Tuesday.  We’ll see how it goes. Been doing a lot of writing on Channelers lately.  And this time is no exception! In particular, I’ve been wondering if there's room for a sixth Calling: the Haunted. The Haunted There are those who live with a Spiritual affliction: a family curse, intermittent possession, psychic wounds from exposure to a manifestation - whatever the cause, the Haunted lives with a power they can try to manage but never fully control.  The act of Channeling itself is risky, with twisted and unpredictable Techniques and Incarnations, and a tendency for the Haunted’s power to run away from them. The hidden truth of every Haunted is that they bear their burden because they believe they deserve it.  They may despise their state or try to suppress it, but they will remain cursed only as long as they believe, consciously or otherwise, that they should be.  If a Haunted eve...
Post a Comment
Read more