Skip to main content

Exercise Results: Sucess! For Amberlodge

A short post today as it’s been a long-ass week and I’ve got a packed schedule for tomorrow so I’m trying to conserve energy.  EDIT: I didn’t get this written in time, and now it’s somehow Sunday again.  Hooray for Time, #1 Bastard Extraordinaire.

I did indeed attempt what I set out to do in my last post: I sat down (on the floor!) with my iPad hanging off a chair above me, all my utterly un-matching example components before me, and last month’s playlist in my ears, and I talked to myself and played, building as I went, for a couple of turns, which took about 40 minutes, though my attempt to record myself only captured about 23 minutes of that, because iPad stupid.  It was weird, it felt foolish, and it was still kind of fun, and definitely useful in terms of showing me where the gaps between presumption and reality were.  Some key takeaways:

  • Four actions per turn does not feel like a lot, particularly if you have to spend an action to move things, which feels profoundly unsexy.
  • On the flip side, 12 full months to every round feels very long.  Is there a world where I increase the length of each turn / decrease the breakdown? Four seasons is easy, but feels TOO simplified.  How about… Instead of the twelve months, do six two-month sections? Heart of Winter, Early Spring, Late Spring, Height of Summer, Early Autumn, Late Autumn
  • The processor cards need to have their [input accepted amounts] updated to accommodate the proper amounts.  Specifically, a brewing vat that requires 20% sugar needs to be able to accept a lot of 1 sugar and 4 water, because if it specifically requires 2 sugar and 8 water, but a maple tree only ever gives out 1 sugar and 9 water per production, you have to refine AND combine lots in order to meet the processing requirement.  Simplify the ratio, least common denominator.
  • Slots need to be further elaborated on.  Because time should be as much of a challenge as it currently is, but also more of an ally.  I need to have slots that can only be filled in by actions (this unexplored land won’t discover itself), slots that can only be filled in by time (you can’t make wine age faster), and slots that can be both (water evaporates slowly over time, but can be sped up if you expend the energy on an evaporator)

Not a bad amount of data to come out of such a simple exercise.  And I’m certainly glad that I didn’t build everything before making these realizations.  What a fuck in the face that would have been.  I need to adjust my to-do lists accordingly, and keep building as I go.  A very useful and fruitful reminder.

So much for a short post! That’s it for this week, see you in the week that starts in five and a third hours.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

TTRPG Tuesday: Three Means Of Resolving

Hi it’s another TTRPG Tuesday! First of the year.  Let’s get right into it. Saw a challenge on Twitter to make some resolution mechanics.  I can do those! Here we go: Hand to Hand The player performing the action and the person running the game or otherwise opposing the action both put their dominant fists toward one another, bounce them three times to get a rhythm, and reveal a number with their fingers, 0-5.  Sum the two numbers, and if the number is greater than 5, subtract six, so that the final number is always between 0 and 5.  On a 0, the action fails catastrophically, on a 1-2 it fails, 3-4 it succeeds, on a 5 it succeeds spectacularly.  The player taking the action starts the game with all five fingers up on their non-dominant hand; after an attempt, they may lower fingers on that hand to add to the sum of the attempt. Ex. Alice attempts to seduce Cat’s character over to the coup conspirators.  They put their dominant hands together (right for ...

TTRPG Tuesday: Minimum Viable Product for WWDW?

Hello and welcome back to TTRPG Tuesday! I’ve put together a barebones introductory document for We Won, Didn’t We? and, well, I think it speaks for itself.  Check it out HERE ! This introduces the skeleton of the game, as well as walking through the steps; I’d say next up is a rudimentary character sheet, and maybe I can bring this to a Playtest Zero session and see what folks think of character creation within one of the starting Bulbs.  I’ve opened the doc up for comments, so if you have thoughts dear reader, fire away.  Brain fried, go read the doc, til next time!

TTRPG Tuesday: I'm A Hack, Is What I Am

Hey welcome back to TTRPG Tuesday! Tuesday technically ended 51 minutes ago as I begin to write this, but who gives a shit.  It’s been a while and I feel like I need to get a post out. Today, let’s look at hacks - I’ve written settings, adventures, classes, monsters, and modules for other systems before, but I’ve never done a hack; it’s one of those things where I’d have no issue with someone doing it with something I wrote (game design-wise; playwriting-wise I’d be a bit stroppy) however! I have been advised that it’s a good starting point for folks who have never built a system from scratch, so maybe it’s a worthwhile exercise to embark upon.  So what system would I want to hack? Well, this is just first principles basic concept stuff, but since Aaron Lim’s the one who suggested I look at a hack, I’m going to take one of his systems: SPEEDMECH. MASKS & BELTS Implementing the tactical turn-based combat of SPEEDMECH, Masks & Belts is a game of Driver moves and form-cha...