Skip to main content

Mechanic Monday: Dungeon AI in Fantasy GM Squared

I should work on this so I stop boiling my own blood over a willfully obtuse friend of an equally obtuse in-law opining on FB that police shootings are all accidents.  I am so filled with rage and loathing, so much of the time.  Oh man, I hope getting political doesn’t cause my readership to fall from zero all the way down to zero.  That would suck.

So I’ve been back in talks with Those Ironrise Fellas about Fantasy GM Squared, and we got to talking about solo modes.  I had honestly never thought about FGM-sq having a solitaire option, which is wild since I think about solo games… all the… time…

(Stares into the Void thinking about that rebel Prince of Hell deck thinner game idea again)

Anyway I’d never thought about it because not only are Fantasy Sports are such an interactive experience, but that interactivity is a feature, not a bug, and a key feature, not an add-on.  The greater the interactivity in a Fantasy Sport league, the more profoundly you experience the core kernel of the whole thing.

But! I wanted to give a fair crack to my collaborators’ thoughts and the possibilities presented therein.  And you know what, sometimes you find yourself in a League where the prevailing vibe doesn’t include trash talk or any talk at all, no trades, no offers.  Times like that can feel a lot like multiplayer solitaire.  So, while it wouldn’t mirror the full experience, maybe there’s something there that can be adapted.

Ergo! Behold this week’s Mechanic: an AI for Fantasy GM Squared

The Blight Upon The Land
In Fantasy GM Squared, crises occur from time to time that require the full, undivided attention of your Guild.  Descend into the Dungeon, a set of cards/tiles that will gradually flip over, revealing interconnected threats that can only be overcome by judicious organization of the parties of Heroes you send in to meet them.  It will take multiple Seasons for the scourge to fully be purged from the land, and you will be rewarded points based on how effectively you face the challenges that arise.

A good sideways approach to solitaire modes is to look at what would go into a cooperative mode, and then consolidate that decision-making / avataric representation into one person.  This first stab draws on a related part of the Fantasy genre, the dungeon crawler, which could be a cooperative or lone experience, but which takes the competitive aspect of the regular game and creates a common non-player enemy that must be defeated.  The version I had in mind when I wrote the above is basically a series of partial-information puzzles with some fog of war built in.  I could also ditch the dungeon aspect, which draws on the Fantasy side, and go more on the Sports side, have the AI be fictitious GMs from the Hall of Fame.  Go up against the Legends, that type of framing.  Could adapt the Calendar Deck, or crib from that old Danger 5 Game I abandoned when Season 2 disappointed me.  I love the design space that’s being explored re: the overlapping Carboard AI / Automata / Co-op / Solitaire conversations right now.  Very convenient for someone like me who doesn’t live with a gamer.

Well, having said that, I’m gonna try again tomorrow to find time to play Tussie Mussie with my wife (not a metaphor), and to get a playtest of Ironrise’s Potionarium before we touch base on Wednesday.  Til next week!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

TTRPG Tuesday: Three Means Of Resolving

Hi it’s another TTRPG Tuesday! First of the year.  Let’s get right into it. Saw a challenge on Twitter to make some resolution mechanics.  I can do those! Here we go: Hand to Hand The player performing the action and the person running the game or otherwise opposing the action both put their dominant fists toward one another, bounce them three times to get a rhythm, and reveal a number with their fingers, 0-5.  Sum the two numbers, and if the number is greater than 5, subtract six, so that the final number is always between 0 and 5.  On a 0, the action fails catastrophically, on a 1-2 it fails, 3-4 it succeeds, on a 5 it succeeds spectacularly.  The player taking the action starts the game with all five fingers up on their non-dominant hand; after an attempt, they may lower fingers on that hand to add to the sum of the attempt. Ex. Alice attempts to seduce Cat’s character over to the coup conspirators.  They put their dominant hands together (right for ...

TTRPG Tuesday: Minimum Viable Product for WWDW?

Hello and welcome back to TTRPG Tuesday! I’ve put together a barebones introductory document for We Won, Didn’t We? and, well, I think it speaks for itself.  Check it out HERE ! This introduces the skeleton of the game, as well as walking through the steps; I’d say next up is a rudimentary character sheet, and maybe I can bring this to a Playtest Zero session and see what folks think of character creation within one of the starting Bulbs.  I’ve opened the doc up for comments, so if you have thoughts dear reader, fire away.  Brain fried, go read the doc, til next time!

TTRPG Tuesday: I'm A Hack, Is What I Am

Hey welcome back to TTRPG Tuesday! Tuesday technically ended 51 minutes ago as I begin to write this, but who gives a shit.  It’s been a while and I feel like I need to get a post out. Today, let’s look at hacks - I’ve written settings, adventures, classes, monsters, and modules for other systems before, but I’ve never done a hack; it’s one of those things where I’d have no issue with someone doing it with something I wrote (game design-wise; playwriting-wise I’d be a bit stroppy) however! I have been advised that it’s a good starting point for folks who have never built a system from scratch, so maybe it’s a worthwhile exercise to embark upon.  So what system would I want to hack? Well, this is just first principles basic concept stuff, but since Aaron Lim’s the one who suggested I look at a hack, I’m going to take one of his systems: SPEEDMECH. MASKS & BELTS Implementing the tactical turn-based combat of SPEEDMECH, Masks & Belts is a game of Driver moves and form-cha...