Skip to main content

Mechanic Monday: Dungeon AI in Fantasy GM Squared

I should work on this so I stop boiling my own blood over a willfully obtuse friend of an equally obtuse in-law opining on FB that police shootings are all accidents.  I am so filled with rage and loathing, so much of the time.  Oh man, I hope getting political doesn’t cause my readership to fall from zero all the way down to zero.  That would suck.

So I’ve been back in talks with Those Ironrise Fellas about Fantasy GM Squared, and we got to talking about solo modes.  I had honestly never thought about FGM-sq having a solitaire option, which is wild since I think about solo games… all the… time…

(Stares into the Void thinking about that rebel Prince of Hell deck thinner game idea again)

Anyway I’d never thought about it because not only are Fantasy Sports are such an interactive experience, but that interactivity is a feature, not a bug, and a key feature, not an add-on.  The greater the interactivity in a Fantasy Sport league, the more profoundly you experience the core kernel of the whole thing.

But! I wanted to give a fair crack to my collaborators’ thoughts and the possibilities presented therein.  And you know what, sometimes you find yourself in a League where the prevailing vibe doesn’t include trash talk or any talk at all, no trades, no offers.  Times like that can feel a lot like multiplayer solitaire.  So, while it wouldn’t mirror the full experience, maybe there’s something there that can be adapted.

Ergo! Behold this week’s Mechanic: an AI for Fantasy GM Squared

The Blight Upon The Land
In Fantasy GM Squared, crises occur from time to time that require the full, undivided attention of your Guild.  Descend into the Dungeon, a set of cards/tiles that will gradually flip over, revealing interconnected threats that can only be overcome by judicious organization of the parties of Heroes you send in to meet them.  It will take multiple Seasons for the scourge to fully be purged from the land, and you will be rewarded points based on how effectively you face the challenges that arise.

A good sideways approach to solitaire modes is to look at what would go into a cooperative mode, and then consolidate that decision-making / avataric representation into one person.  This first stab draws on a related part of the Fantasy genre, the dungeon crawler, which could be a cooperative or lone experience, but which takes the competitive aspect of the regular game and creates a common non-player enemy that must be defeated.  The version I had in mind when I wrote the above is basically a series of partial-information puzzles with some fog of war built in.  I could also ditch the dungeon aspect, which draws on the Fantasy side, and go more on the Sports side, have the AI be fictitious GMs from the Hall of Fame.  Go up against the Legends, that type of framing.  Could adapt the Calendar Deck, or crib from that old Danger 5 Game I abandoned when Season 2 disappointed me.  I love the design space that’s being explored re: the overlapping Carboard AI / Automata / Co-op / Solitaire conversations right now.  Very convenient for someone like me who doesn’t live with a gamer.

Well, having said that, I’m gonna try again tomorrow to find time to play Tussie Mussie with my wife (not a metaphor), and to get a playtest of Ironrise’s Potionarium before we touch base on Wednesday.  Til next week!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

TTRPG Tuesday: Three Means Of Resolving

Hi it’s another TTRPG Tuesday! First of the year.  Let’s get right into it. Saw a challenge on Twitter to make some resolution mechanics.  I can do those! Here we go: Hand to Hand The player performing the action and the person running the game or otherwise opposing the action both put their dominant fists toward one another, bounce them three times to get a rhythm, and reveal a number with their fingers, 0-5.  Sum the two numbers, and if the number is greater than 5, subtract six, so that the final number is always between 0 and 5.  On a 0, the action fails catastrophically, on a 1-2 it fails, 3-4 it succeeds, on a 5 it succeeds spectacularly.  The player taking the action starts the game with all five fingers up on their non-dominant hand; after an attempt, they may lower fingers on that hand to add to the sum of the attempt. Ex. Alice attempts to seduce Cat’s character over to the coup conspirators.  They put their dominant hands together (right for Alice, left for Cat) and thro
Post a Comment
Read more

TTRPG Tuesday: Minimum Viable Product for WWDW?

Hello and welcome back to TTRPG Tuesday! I’ve put together a barebones introductory document for We Won, Didn’t We? and, well, I think it speaks for itself.  Check it out HERE ! This introduces the skeleton of the game, as well as walking through the steps; I’d say next up is a rudimentary character sheet, and maybe I can bring this to a Playtest Zero session and see what folks think of character creation within one of the starting Bulbs.  I’ve opened the doc up for comments, so if you have thoughts dear reader, fire away.  Brain fried, go read the doc, til next time!
Post a Comment
Read more

TTRPG Tuesday: Beliefs as Roles

  Hello from high above the Rockies, as I make my way back to Chicago from Big Bad Con 2023.     This was my first con in five years, and only my second ever.     I had a better time at it than I did at GenCon, which I understand derives largely from this being an industry con vs a consumer show.     I made a modest number of purchases but it was easy to stick to the constraints of my limited luggage space, which was fine; shopping and new releases were not the attraction here.     Gaming, panels, and (as I soon learned) networking were. This con was certainly less overwhelming and I think my expectations were clearer and my FOMO much lighter, but I’ll readily admit that I had a lot to learn.    I misunderstood or made mistakes regarding almost every event I signed up for, including happy accidents like sitting in on the wrong panel only to learn a ton, or expecting a mending workshop to be about fixing one’s writing when the application was rather more literal, which was a fascinat
Post a Comment
Read more