Skip to main content

Mechanic Monday: Elegant Turn Order Cards

I kind of wanted to write about some mechanics from BURN today (a 2p asymmetric coop set in the world of ROOT) but I ran out of time.  Time is a funny thing in this quarantined world we abruptly find ourselves in.  Elastic and brittle all at once, stretching out and snapping without warning into unlikely instants.  I wanted to write about BURN, a game about someone inside a city trying to help someone trapped inside a city to escape.  Instead I’m going to touch real quick on a mechanic from the reserve pile.  Let’s take a look.

Elegant Turn Order Cards
In GREEM, a 4p game, each player (Red, Green, Blue, Yellow) has 4 initiative cards (numbered 1-4) for the 4 turns that comprise the game, with each number having a different player colour tiebreaker sequence.  At the start of each turn, each player will secretly select an initiative card to play face-down.  Once all players have selected a card, reveal them all simultaneously; turn order will be based on the lowest card played, with each number having a different tie-breaker (All ‘One’ cards break ties in the order of Red>Yellow>Green>Blue, whereas all ‘Two’ cards break ties in the order of Yellow>Green>Blue>Red, etc).

This mechanic is particularly utilitarian.  Very little attached to it, though it can scale up and down a bit, and probably be expanded upon a little bit before it loses its nice clean elegance.  You could also replace/conjoin numbers with roles for role selection.  Just a practical little widget for trying out in a design where you need to determine order but wish to bake in some choice and player agency.
Tune in next week.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

TTRPG Tuesday: Three Means Of Resolving

Hi it’s another TTRPG Tuesday! First of the year.  Let’s get right into it. Saw a challenge on Twitter to make some resolution mechanics.  I can do those! Here we go: Hand to Hand The player performing the action and the person running the game or otherwise opposing the action both put their dominant fists toward one another, bounce them three times to get a rhythm, and reveal a number with their fingers, 0-5.  Sum the two numbers, and if the number is greater than 5, subtract six, so that the final number is always between 0 and 5.  On a 0, the action fails catastrophically, on a 1-2 it fails, 3-4 it succeeds, on a 5 it succeeds spectacularly.  The player taking the action starts the game with all five fingers up on their non-dominant hand; after an attempt, they may lower fingers on that hand to add to the sum of the attempt. Ex. Alice attempts to seduce Cat’s character over to the coup conspirators.  They put their dominant hands together (right for Alice, left for Cat) and thro

TTRPG Tuesday: Minimum Viable Product for WWDW?

Hello and welcome back to TTRPG Tuesday! I’ve put together a barebones introductory document for We Won, Didn’t We? and, well, I think it speaks for itself.  Check it out HERE ! This introduces the skeleton of the game, as well as walking through the steps; I’d say next up is a rudimentary character sheet, and maybe I can bring this to a Playtest Zero session and see what folks think of character creation within one of the starting Bulbs.  I’ve opened the doc up for comments, so if you have thoughts dear reader, fire away.  Brain fried, go read the doc, til next time!

TTRPG Tuesday: Beliefs as Roles

  Hello from high above the Rockies, as I make my way back to Chicago from Big Bad Con 2023.     This was my first con in five years, and only my second ever.     I had a better time at it than I did at GenCon, which I understand derives largely from this being an industry con vs a consumer show.     I made a modest number of purchases but it was easy to stick to the constraints of my limited luggage space, which was fine; shopping and new releases were not the attraction here.     Gaming, panels, and (as I soon learned) networking were. This con was certainly less overwhelming and I think my expectations were clearer and my FOMO much lighter, but I’ll readily admit that I had a lot to learn.    I misunderstood or made mistakes regarding almost every event I signed up for, including happy accidents like sitting in on the wrong panel only to learn a ton, or expecting a mending workshop to be about fixing one’s writing when the application was rather more literal, which was a fascinat