Skip to main content

Mechanic Monday: Cooperative Players, Competitive System

New year, still here.  In spite of all my rage, I am still alive.  And back at it with another Mechanic Monday! Not a lot of preamble for you today since I already got some writing out of my system with a little bit of DnD character doodling - I have Session Zero of my first campaign in yeeeeeaaaaars tomorrow - and I need to get home to my beloved pooch so I’ll skip the recipe blog bit and get straight to the mechanic.  This one popped into my head after rapid-fire consuming Dan Thurot’s Best Week (an annual run-down of top games in custom categories pulled from his year’s worth of reviews) and BGG Design Diaries for Oath by Cole Wehrle.

Cooperative Resolution to Conflicting Player Asymmetry
In GREEM, the players represent state actors who wish to broker a peace, but who are empowered by policies from governments that are fundamentally at odds with one another.  Each player’s pool of possible actions is tied to a rule that must always be observed - and while the action may lead to peace, the rules ensure behaviour bends toward conflict.  Players must work together within the confines of their respective government’s agendae, complying with rules in order to undo them and achieve peace; but as the rules fall away, the actions they can take shrink.  Can the players successfully secure a treaty before they’re forcibly retired or war breaks out?

So the thought process here was that there are plenty of semi-coop games out there, but the design space (near as I can tell) has largely had to do with toggling victory conditions to create Dilemma uncertainty.  I wondered what it would take for players to have clear and set victory terms and conditions - this would be a definitively cooperative game, but with systems that would force competitive behaviour.  I thought of a play I once hoped to produce and star in, Lee Blessing’s A Walk In The Woods.  It’s a beautiful, bitter play about nuclear disarmament negotiations between a Soviet and American diplomat, and the institutional hopelessness that crushes their individual and shared hopes of securing peace.  I think that a game like that can take advantage of player ingenuity and agency, while maintaining some intriguing tension with impossible choices.

Anyway that’s the design, steal away, steal away, steal away non-existent intellectual property robot thieves! Til next week.  Fuck this year.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

TTRPG Tuesday: Three Means Of Resolving

Hi it’s another TTRPG Tuesday! First of the year.  Let’s get right into it. Saw a challenge on Twitter to make some resolution mechanics.  I can do those! Here we go: Hand to Hand The player performing the action and the person running the game or otherwise opposing the action both put their dominant fists toward one another, bounce them three times to get a rhythm, and reveal a number with their fingers, 0-5.  Sum the two numbers, and if the number is greater than 5, subtract six, so that the final number is always between 0 and 5.  On a 0, the action fails catastrophically, on a 1-2 it fails, 3-4 it succeeds, on a 5 it succeeds spectacularly.  The player taking the action starts the game with all five fingers up on their non-dominant hand; after an attempt, they may lower fingers on that hand to add to the sum of the attempt. Ex. Alice attempts to seduce Cat’s character over to the coup conspirators.  They put their dominant hands together (right for ...
Post a Comment
Read more

TTRPG Tuesday: Campaigning

  Hey it's TTRPG Tuesday, let's see if I get something written before sleep overtakes me. I'm still on that Channelers kick, but today I want to talk about a possible campaign path: The Magpie Offensive.  I see this as a military campaign where the PCs are conscripted, volunteers, or mercenaries for an army that is marching to quell Spirit threats and unite the region under a protectorate. There should be free RP sections as interludes between missions, and missions should be chosen by the party.  The army ensures loyalty with intangible rewards as well as artifact items. NOTE: This whole thing is being designed with the Rascal article on militarization in ttrpgs in mind. What is the thrust of the campaign? It's fundamentally one of conquest.  How do I encourage characters to question their presence and their complicity? How much interpersonal violence is an acceptable price to pay for environmental justice? How can party composition affect all this from jump? H...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mechanic Monday: Winding Down an Engine Builder

  Welcome back to Mechanic Monday! Been a minute hasn't it? Remember when I did one of these a week for a year? 2020 was such a productive time! Totally worth the complete decay of my sense of self! Today I’m going to go about things a little backwards.  Normally I start with the mechanical kernel, mock up how it would look in a hypothetical game, and then do a little theorycrafting around it.  This time, I uh already have a v1.0 prototype.  So let's start there. Gradually Shorter Engines In Paper Moth Dynasty, you play a young Monarch, with nine Role cards flipped to either their Sun or Moon side.  In the first round you will place 7 of the 9 available cards in your Court tableau, then Exile a card and play the next round with one fewer card to draw and one fewer to play, then do the same again before the third and final round.  You will therefore place 7 cards in the first round, 6 in the second, and 5 in the third round. So engine builders (and th...
Post a Comment
Read more