Skip to main content

Mechanic Monday: Relationship Sub-Mechanic

Another long week, and I should really be trying to catch up to my deadlines for the latest writing gig but I want to see if I can get a Mechanic Monday out under the wire before I succumb to sleep! I’m so tired! Here we go!
I’ve been thinking about ways that analog games can feel as worldbuilt as digital games, particularly with regards to having a multiplicity of mechanics.  Because most mechanics require their own components, it’s trendy in modern hobby gaming, Ameritrash aside, to limit the number of mechanics and systems. Heck I’ve waxed full many a moon about how great elegance is as a design constraint and goal.  But maybe solo games, where there’s so much built-in bookkeeping anyway, as well as a history of popularity among grognardy wargamers. Maybe when it’s just you, there’s a little more room for going for mechanic mania without anyone complaining about downtime.

So here’s a mechanic! Feels out of place, but that’s fine, I’m barely staving off sleep as it is.

Letters to Your Dad
In Amberlodge, something you can spend some of your downtime on is  writing letters to your estranged father. There’s a relationship tracker and a deck of reactions he can have to your letters.  Cards move the tracker up and down, and in time you can remove or skip the cards that worsen your relationship. Whenever you hit certain milestones, your progress is locked.  At the end, your milestones may not be worth VP but they paint a better picture of how well your character has progressed at an aesthetic goal.

Ok so is that vague? Yes.  It ull of opportunities, but I’m too sleepy to do a deep dive on any of this right now.  Maybe nexf time. I’m so tired. More later

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

TTRPG Tuesday: Three Means Of Resolving

Hi it’s another TTRPG Tuesday! First of the year.  Let’s get right into it. Saw a challenge on Twitter to make some resolution mechanics.  I can do those! Here we go: Hand to Hand The player performing the action and the person running the game or otherwise opposing the action both put their dominant fists toward one another, bounce them three times to get a rhythm, and reveal a number with their fingers, 0-5.  Sum the two numbers, and if the number is greater than 5, subtract six, so that the final number is always between 0 and 5.  On a 0, the action fails catastrophically, on a 1-2 it fails, 3-4 it succeeds, on a 5 it succeeds spectacularly.  The player taking the action starts the game with all five fingers up on their non-dominant hand; after an attempt, they may lower fingers on that hand to add to the sum of the attempt. Ex. Alice attempts to seduce Cat’s character over to the coup conspirators.  They put their dominant hands together (right for Alice, left for Cat) and thro
Post a Comment
Read more

TTRPG Tuesday: Minimum Viable Product for WWDW?

Hello and welcome back to TTRPG Tuesday! I’ve put together a barebones introductory document for We Won, Didn’t We? and, well, I think it speaks for itself.  Check it out HERE ! This introduces the skeleton of the game, as well as walking through the steps; I’d say next up is a rudimentary character sheet, and maybe I can bring this to a Playtest Zero session and see what folks think of character creation within one of the starting Bulbs.  I’ve opened the doc up for comments, so if you have thoughts dear reader, fire away.  Brain fried, go read the doc, til next time!
Post a Comment
Read more

TTRPG Tuesday: Beliefs as Roles

  Hello from high above the Rockies, as I make my way back to Chicago from Big Bad Con 2023.     This was my first con in five years, and only my second ever.     I had a better time at it than I did at GenCon, which I understand derives largely from this being an industry con vs a consumer show.     I made a modest number of purchases but it was easy to stick to the constraints of my limited luggage space, which was fine; shopping and new releases were not the attraction here.     Gaming, panels, and (as I soon learned) networking were. This con was certainly less overwhelming and I think my expectations were clearer and my FOMO much lighter, but I’ll readily admit that I had a lot to learn.    I misunderstood or made mistakes regarding almost every event I signed up for, including happy accidents like sitting in on the wrong panel only to learn a ton, or expecting a mending workshop to be about fixing one’s writing when the application was rather more literal, which was a fascinat
Post a Comment
Read more