Skip to main content

Mechanic Monday: Is this a ?

Hahahaha I don’t actually have time to do this today and yet! It’s Mechanic Monday!
Today’s a conjecture on something that I don’t even know exists? It’s based on my understanding of what a program can do, and spins wildly off into hypothesis territory from there.  Anyway at my day job everyone has at least two screens.  It’s that kind of workplace.  Three is becoming the norm, I’ve seen people with five.  Which seems aggressively excessive.  And I see a weird number of people using programs that look like they’re for coding? Considering very few people here work in any capacity on anything that would involve code? But it means I’ve long flirted with the idea of playing a MUD right out in the open on my desktop.  Just fire up Darkmists or some other telnet-based text game, and who would know it wasn’t me tappity-tap-tap-tapping away on important company business (once the ASCII art intro finishes scrolling of course)? I already do some shorthand things - the main reason that I don’t play games at work is that I spend a lot of it doing writing, be it for games or my theatre.  Sometimes I hide hours of writing by doing it in Outlook so it looks as though I’m just composing a complex work email.  And lately I’ve been thinking about Excel.
Excel is, in a sense, programmable, right? I mean you can allow user inputs that automatically generate outputs, and you can link those outputs together to form chains.  Right? If that’s the case, here’s my idea:

Excel-lent Bandersnatch
In BINDERSNITCH, you open an Excel Workbook and are confronted with an introduction and page after page of hashed gibberish and nonsense.  However, by following the clues and changing or entering certain codewords into various cells of the spreadsheet, you can cause the gibberish to resolve into clear stories that lead you on to the next part of the puzzle.  Some puzzles will have you go back and tweak the programming of certain cells in previously solved puzzles to generate a different result.  Some puzzles will allow a branching of the narrative.  Depending on how you work through the story, different endings are possible.

Is that how Excel works? I think so, but I’m not sure! I thought of this because I’ve been working as a writer on an escape-room-esque experience - which I really need to do some work on, on top of the other things I have to do today! So avidi-avidi-avidi-a-that’s all folks! Catch you next week for a more coherent MECHANIC MONDAY.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

TTRPG Tuesday: Three Means Of Resolving

Hi it’s another TTRPG Tuesday! First of the year.  Let’s get right into it. Saw a challenge on Twitter to make some resolution mechanics.  I can do those! Here we go: Hand to Hand The player performing the action and the person running the game or otherwise opposing the action both put their dominant fists toward one another, bounce them three times to get a rhythm, and reveal a number with their fingers, 0-5.  Sum the two numbers, and if the number is greater than 5, subtract six, so that the final number is always between 0 and 5.  On a 0, the action fails catastrophically, on a 1-2 it fails, 3-4 it succeeds, on a 5 it succeeds spectacularly.  The player taking the action starts the game with all five fingers up on their non-dominant hand; after an attempt, they may lower fingers on that hand to add to the sum of the attempt. Ex. Alice attempts to seduce Cat’s character over to the coup conspirators.  They put their dominant hands together (right for ...

TTRPG Tuesday: Minimum Viable Product for WWDW?

Hello and welcome back to TTRPG Tuesday! I’ve put together a barebones introductory document for We Won, Didn’t We? and, well, I think it speaks for itself.  Check it out HERE ! This introduces the skeleton of the game, as well as walking through the steps; I’d say next up is a rudimentary character sheet, and maybe I can bring this to a Playtest Zero session and see what folks think of character creation within one of the starting Bulbs.  I’ve opened the doc up for comments, so if you have thoughts dear reader, fire away.  Brain fried, go read the doc, til next time!

TTRPG Tuesday: I'm A Hack, Is What I Am

Hey welcome back to TTRPG Tuesday! Tuesday technically ended 51 minutes ago as I begin to write this, but who gives a shit.  It’s been a while and I feel like I need to get a post out. Today, let’s look at hacks - I’ve written settings, adventures, classes, monsters, and modules for other systems before, but I’ve never done a hack; it’s one of those things where I’d have no issue with someone doing it with something I wrote (game design-wise; playwriting-wise I’d be a bit stroppy) however! I have been advised that it’s a good starting point for folks who have never built a system from scratch, so maybe it’s a worthwhile exercise to embark upon.  So what system would I want to hack? Well, this is just first principles basic concept stuff, but since Aaron Lim’s the one who suggested I look at a hack, I’m going to take one of his systems: SPEEDMECH. MASKS & BELTS Implementing the tactical turn-based combat of SPEEDMECH, Masks & Belts is a game of Driver moves and form-cha...