A Quick Game (or Two) of Four Thematic Poker Suits

As promised, I am come out of hiding. And today, so soon after my last post (the wonderfully poorly-received Sweet Game), I have yet another complete(ish but largely untested) fast little game design for you!
Here's For King and Country, a game to be played between two players, using the standard 52-card poker deck. I designed it for the Dice Hate Me Loves Cards contest, not realizing that they were looking for games that used custom decks. As my game used existing 52-card decks, it was not an eligible entry.
I'm still pleased by the game, however. It's a quick, rough thing, but I like the 'spread' mechanic, and it's also an homage of sort to Sid Sackson, and some of my other favourite designers.
Anyhow, if anyone's interested, the game can be found here. It includes the rules and scoring for For King and Country, and also for the 2+ player variant, For Love or Money.
Slan!

Comments

TTRPG Tuesday: Three Means Of Resolving

Hi it’s another TTRPG Tuesday! First of the year. Let’s get right into it. Saw a challenge on Twitter to make some resolution mechanics. I can do those! Here we go: Hand to Hand The player performing the action and the person running the game or otherwise opposing the action both put their dominant fists toward one another, bounce them three times to get a rhythm, and reveal a number with their fingers, 0-5. Sum the two numbers, and if the number is greater than 5, subtract six, so that the final number is always between 0 and 5. On a 0, the action fails catastrophically, on a 1-2 it fails, 3-4 it succeeds, on a 5 it succeeds spectacularly. The player taking the action starts the game with all five fingers up on their non-dominant hand; after an attempt, they may lower fingers on that hand to add to the sum of the attempt. Ex. Alice attempts to seduce Cat’s character over to the coup conspirators. They put their dominant hands together (right for Alice, left for Cat) and thro

TTRPG Tuesday: Beliefs as Roles

Hello from high above the Rockies, as I make my way back to Chicago from Big Bad Con 2023. This was my first con in five years, and only my second ever. I had a better time at it than I did at GenCon, which I understand derives largely from this being an industry con vs a consumer show. I made a modest number of purchases but it was easy to stick to the constraints of my limited luggage space, which was fine; shopping and new releases were not the attraction here. Gaming, panels, and (as I soon learned) networking were. This con was certainly less overwhelming and I think my expectations were clearer and my FOMO much lighter, but I’ll readily admit that I had a lot to learn. I misunderstood or made mistakes regarding almost every event I signed up for, including happy accidents like sitting in on the wrong panel only to learn a ton, or expecting a mending workshop to be about fixing one’s writing when the application was rather more literal, which was a fascinat

TTRPG Tuesday: Minimum Viable Product for WWDW?

Hello and welcome back to TTRPG Tuesday! I’ve put together a barebones introductory document for We Won, Didn’t We? and, well, I think it speaks for itself. Check it out HERE ! This introduces the skeleton of the game, as well as walking through the steps; I’d say next up is a rudimentary character sheet, and maybe I can bring this to a Playtest Zero session and see what folks think of character creation within one of the starting Bulbs. I’ve opened the doc up for comments, so if you have thoughts dear reader, fire away. Brain fried, go read the doc, til next time!

Velocimancer Games

Search This Blog